USF’s spending surge has reshaped the national conversation.
The Bulls now operate with a financial profile that rivals lower‑tier Power programs.
Their new stadium and coaching salaries exceed most Group of Five benchmarks.
Recent reporting across national and conference outlets shows USF leading the American in infrastructure and staffing investment.
The program’s aggressive strategy reflects a long‑term push for national relevance.
Boise State Maintains Strong Tradition but Trails USF’s Scale
Boise State continues to invest in football facilities and staff.
However, its spending remains below USF’s current levels.
The Broncos upgraded their operations building, but no project matches USF’s stadium cost.
Boise State’s coaching salaries remain competitive, yet they fall short of Brian Hartline’s package.
USF’s financial commitment now surpasses the Mountain West’s flagship brand.
Tulane Focuses on Stability but Lags in Infrastructure
Tulane emphasizes coaching continuity and roster development.
The Green Wave maintain solid staffing budgets but lack major facility expansion.
Their stadium remains functional but modest compared to USF’s new build.
Tulane’s spending strategy centers on efficiency rather than scale.
USF’s broader investment approach creates a clear separation between the programs.
Memphis Invests Consistently but Cannot Match USF’s Growth
Memphis continues to support football with strong administrative backing.
The Liberty Stadium renovation remains a key project, but it is not university‑owned.
USF’s on‑campus stadium gives the Bulls a strong revenue advantage.
Memphis maintains competitive coaching salaries, yet none approach Hartline’s level.
USF’s staff budget and recruiting resources exceed Memphis across multiple categories.
UNLV Shows Ambition but Operates Differently
UNLV benefits from Allegiant Stadium access and strong local support.
However, the program does not control its primary venue.
USF’s stadium project provides long‑term stability that UNLV cannot replicate.
UNLV’s coaching salaries remain respectable but below USF’s top‑tier structure.
The Rebels invest heavily in recruiting, yet USF’s broader financial model remains stronger.
Why USF Now Leads the Group of Five
USF’s stadium construction, coaching salaries, and expanded recruiting budgets create unmatched momentum.
The Bulls now outspend Boise State, Tulane, Memphis, and UNLV in key categories.
This investment positions USF as the most ambitious program in the Group of Five.
